Time Use Surveys in the UK: A Methodological Review
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c6af/7c6af6ede83381de56fbb42944127ab592db95c7" alt="Lewes, England. Market stalls along Cliffe High St in Lewes busy with visitors."
This inquiry, led by Sense about Science, examined how well the government's evidence for COVID-19 decisions served society. These findings focus on the results of a NatCen survey of UK adults on how the public engaged with COVID-19 policy evidence.
The full results of the survey were published with the report of Sense about Science’s What Counts? scoping inquiry.
More details about Sense about Science’s inquiry.
Guy Goodwin, Chief Executive of the National Centre for Social Research, said: “As we emerge from the pandemic, it’s important we understand and learn from people’s experiences with government information on Covid-19. This research can help shape future public health messaging, helping people across society to make sound decisions about key issues affecting their lives.”
Tracey Brown, Director of Sense about Science said: “The government's communication of evidence was largely authoritarian, with its emphasis on simple slogans and rules, although some parts of government did try to provide and discuss the evidence base for decisions. Government must now ask itself whether it sees its role as enabling society or only instructing it. The pandemic has shown that, for rapidly evolving policies to be successfully implemented in many and varied settings, people on the ground need to be empowered to make well-reasoned judgements. That requires a government committed to being transparent and responsive, sharing what it knows and explaining decisions not made on evidence.”
Fieldwork for this strand of the study was conducted using the random-probability NatCen Panel. The NatCen Panel is a panel of people recruited from high-quality, random probability surveys such as the British Social Attitudes survey. Those agreeing to join the Panel are then invited to take part in additional short surveys covering a range of different topics either online or over the phone. By using a probability-based sample and allowing those without internet access to take part this design reduces the risk of bias compared to online-only surveys which exclude those who do not have access to, or are less confident using, the internet or surveys using convenience samples which are more likely to include people who are more ‘available’ or particularly want to express their views.
The survey was conducted between 24th of September and 24th of October 2021. A total of 2,563 of the 3,260 panel members invited to take part did so, giving a 79% survey response rate. Taking account of nonresponse at the recruitment interview and at the point of recruitment to the panel, the overall response rate was 10%. The data were weighted to be representative of the UK adult (18+) population.
Britain’s longest-running random probability-based panel, providing robust data from a representative sample at affordable prices.
Click here for more information.Director of Sense about Science Tracey Brown was interviewed about the findings on BBC Radio Scotland’s Good Morning Scotland, 16th December 2021. Interview begins at 1:55:18.
Receive a regular update, sent directly to your inbox, with a summary of our current events, research, blogs and comment.
Subscribe