Exploring targeted incentives to improve response in under-represented groups on the Opinions and Lifestyle Survey
Survey researchers recognize that total survey error consists of multiple components, broadly pertaining to error sources and biases along the measurement process on the one hand and to representation on the other.
However, the relationship between these different error sources remains less well understood.
Drawing on 1,452 estimates of measurement error from large-scale MTMM experiments in the European Social Survey, covering 24 countries and 21 languages, we investigate the relationship between measurement error, representation bias, country, and language.
Our findings indicate a positive association between measurement error and representation bias.
Measurement error is very similar across languages within the same country, but shows some more variation between countries for the same language.
We conclude that the highly professional questionnaire translation process in the ESS effectively minimizes the impact of language differences on measurement error, while cultural differences and variations in sample composition continue to play a crucial role in contributing to measurement error.
Receive a regular update, sent directly to your inbox, with a summary of our current events, research, blogs and comment.
Subscribe